週次 |
授課內容 |
第1週 |
如何理解當代小國安全政策
Miriam Fendius Elman, "The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in Its Own Backyard," British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, No. 2 (April 1995)
Stephen M. Walt, The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987)
Raimo Vayrynen, "Small States: Persisting Despite Doubts, in Efraim Inbar and Gabriel Sheffer ed., The national security of small states in a changing world (Newbury House, London: Frank Cass, 1997)
Laurent Goetschel, “Small States and the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) of the EU: A Comparative Analysis, NFP 42 Working Paper, No. 14 (September 2000), pp. 3-7.
|
第2週 |
歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(一):抗衡或扈從的內生因素
吳玉山,「抗衡或扈從:面對強鄰時的策略抉擇(上)」,問題與研究,1997,第36卷第二期 (1997年2月),頁1-32。
吳玉山,「抗衡或扈從:面對強鄰時的策略抉擇(下)」,問題與研究(1997年3月),頁61-80。
楊三億,「烏克蘭安全策略選擇:內部因素分析」,問題與研究,第57卷第1期(2018年3月),頁1-28。
Yang, San-Yi, "Quo Vadis? Borderland States' Security Strategy in Europe and Southeast Asia," Tamkang Journal of International Affairs, Vol. 21, No. 1 (July 2017), pp. 53-90.
楊三億,「歐洲中小型國家安全政策:策略選擇與轉型」,問題與研究,第56卷第2期 (2017年6月), 頁31-66.
Robert Jervis, "Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma," World Politics, no. 30 (1978), pp. 167-214.
Miriam Fendius Elman, "The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism
in Its Own Backyard," British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, No. 2 (April 1995).
|
第3週 |
歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(二):抗衡或扈從的外生因素 Renske Doorenspleet, Democratic Transition: Exploring the Structure of the Fourth Wave (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005), pp. 2-8.
David C. Kang, “Between Balancing and Bandwagoning: South Korea’s Response to China,” Journal of East Asian Studies, No. 9 (2009).
|
第4週 |
歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(三):中立
M. M. Abbenhuis, "Too Good To Be True? European Hope for Neutrality Before 1914," in
Herman Amersfoort and Wim Klinkert ed., Small Powers in the Age of Total War 1900-1940 (Leiden, Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2011).
Raimo Vayrynen, "Small States: Persisting Despite Doubts, in Efraim Inbar and
Gabriel Sheffer ed., The national security of small states in a changing world (Newbury House, London: Frank Cass, 1997).
Efraim Karsh, Neutrality and Small States (New York: Routledge, 2011).
|
第5週 |
歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(四):轉入與轉出
SanYi Yang, “Social Learning Theory and EU Policy Learning: Conditions, Concepts, and Limits,” International Relations(Stosunki Miedzynarodowe), Vol. 49, No. 1 (July 2014), pp. 203-218.
楊三億,「誘因政策與民主化過程:以塞爾維亞為例」,載於林碧炤、鄧中堅主編,金磚國家俄羅斯及歐亞地區研究(台北:五南出版社,2012年1月),頁221-261。
|
第6週 |
歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(五):多層級治理體系下的小國安全政策
楊三億,「規範創新與小國非傳統安全政策:以芬蘭氣候政策為例」,理論與政策,第20卷第2期(2017年6月),頁43-75。
Andrew Moravcsik, The Choice for Europe (New York: Cornell University Press, 1998).
黃偉峰,「剖析歐洲聯盟正在成型的治理體系」,歐美研究,第33卷第2期(2003年6月),頁296-299。
藍玉春,「歐盟多層級治理:論點與現象」,政治科學論叢,第24期(2005年6月)。
蘇宏達,「歐盟理事會」,載於黃偉峰主編,歐盟聯盟的組織與運作,第二版(台北:五南出版社,2007年12月),頁185-186。
|
第7週 |
歐盟安全政策研究
European Union, A Secured Europe in a Better World, European Security Strategy,Brussels, 12 December 2003.
European Union, Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy-Providing Security in a Changing World, Brussels, 11 December 2008, S407/08, pp. 3-6.
European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, 10 May 2005, The Hague Programme: ten priorities for the next five years, COM(2005) 184 final, Official Journal C 236 of 24.9.2005.
|
第8週 |
小國安全政策個案研究(西歐)
Skander Nasra, “Governance in EU Foreign Policy: Exploring Small State Influence,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2 (March 2011), pp. 164-180.
Ivo Maes and Amy Verdun, “Small States and the Creation of EMU: Belgium and the
Netherlands, Pace-setters and Gate-keepers,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 43, no. 2 (2005), pp. 330-331.
|
第9週 |
小國安全政策個案研究(北歐)
David Arter, “Small State Influence Within the EU: The Case of Finland’s Northern Dimension Initiative,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 38, No. 5 (December 2000), pp. 679-682.
|
第10週 |
小國安全政策個案研究(南歐)
Lucia Quaglia and Edward Moxon-Browne, “What makes a good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland compared,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 44, No. 2 (2006), p. 351.
|
第11週 |
小國安全政策個案研究(中東歐)
Martin Dangerfield, “The Visegrád Group in the Expanded European Union: From Preaccession to Postaccession Cooperation,” East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 22, No. 3 (Summer 2008), pp. 630-667.
Martin Dangerfield, “The Contribution of the Visegrad Group to the European Union's ‘Eastern’ Policy: Rhetoric or Reality?” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 61, No. 10 (December 2009), pp. 1740–1746.
Johan Leman and Stef Janssens, “Human smuggling and trafficking from/via Eastern Europe: the former ‘intelligence’ and the intermediary structures,” Journal on Moving Communities, Vol. 6, No. 1(2006).
|
第12週 |
非歐盟之歐洲小國與其他國家
楊三億,「歐盟對烏克蘭誘因政策:從地緣政治觀點分析政策外溢效果」,問題與研究,第53卷第1期(2014年3月),頁1-34。
楊三億,「前蘇聯地區內部改革與對外政策偏好關係:以烏克蘭、白俄羅斯與摩爾多瓦為例」,問題與研究,第48卷第3期(2009年9月),頁97-121。
|
第13週 |
小國安全政策影響力之評估
Simone Bunse, Small States and EU Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian,
2009).
Simon Bulmer and Christian Lequesne, The Member States of the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 36-41.
|
第14週 |
分組討論 |
第15週 |
分組討論 |
第16週 |
分組討論 |
第17週 |
分組討論 |
第18週 |
分組討論 |
|