| 週次 |
授課內容 |
| 第1週 |
各週授課進度如下:
1. 如何理解當代小國安全政策
吳玉山，「兩岸關係的理論詮釋」，政治科學論叢，第8期(1997年6月)，頁270-273。
Miriam Fendius Elman, "The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in Its Own Backyard," British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, No. 2 (April 1995)
Stephen M. Walt, The Origins of Alliances (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1987)
Raimo Vayrynen, "Small States: Persisting Despite Doubts, in Efraim Inbar and Gabriel Sheffer ed., The national security of small states in a changing world (Newbury House, London: Frank Cass, 1997)
Laurent Goetschel, “Small States and the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) of the EU: A Comparative Analysis, NFP 42 Working Paper, No. 14 (September 2000), pp. 3-7. |
| 第2週 |
2. 歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(一)：抗衡或扈從的內生因素
吳玉山，「抗衡或扈從：面對強鄰時的策略抉擇(上)」，問題與研究，1997，第36卷第二期(1997年2月)，頁1-32。
吳玉山，「抗衡或扈從：面對強鄰時的策略抉擇(下)」，問題與研究(1997年3月)，頁61-80。
Robert Jervis, "Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma," World Politics, no. 30 (1978), pp. 167-214.
Miriam Fendius Elman, "The Foreign Policies of Small States: Challenging Neorealism in Its Own Backyard," British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 25, No. 2 (April 1995), p. 175.
|
| 第3週 |
3. 歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(一)：抗衡或扈從的外生因素
Renske Doorenspleet, Democratic Transition: Exploring the Structure of the Fourth Wave (Boulder, Colo.: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2005), pp. 2-8.
David C. Kang, “Between Balancing and Bandwagoning: South Korea’s Response to China,” Journal of East Asian Studies, No. 9 (2009).
|
| 第4週 |
4. 歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(三)：中立
M. M. Abbenhuis, "Too Good To Be True? European Hope for Neutrality Before 1914," in Herman Amersfoort and Wim Klinkert ed., Small Powers in the Age of Total War 1900-1940 (Leiden, Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV, 2011).
Raimo Vayrynen, "Small States: Persisting Despite Doubts, in Efraim Inbar and Gabriel Sheffer ed., The national security of small states in a changing world (Newbury House, London: Frank Cass, 1997).
Efraim Karsh, Neutrality and Small States (New York: Routledge, 2011).
|
| 第5週 |
5. 歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(四)：轉入與轉出
SanYi Yang, “Social Learning Theory and EU Policy Learning: Conditions, Concepts, and Limits,” International Relations(Stosunki Miedzynarodowe), Vol. 49, No. 1 (July 2014), pp. 203-218.
楊三億，「誘因政策與民主化過程：以塞爾維亞為例」，載於林碧炤、鄧中堅主編，金磚國家俄羅斯及歐亞地區研究(台北：五南出版社，2012年1月)，頁221-261。
|
| 第6週 |
6. 歐盟小國安全政策分析途徑(五)：多層級治理體系下的小國安全政策
Andrew Moravcsik, The Choice for Europe (New York: Cornell University Press, 1998).
黃偉峰，「剖析歐洲聯盟正在成型的治理體系」，歐美研究，第33卷第2期(2003年6月)，頁296-299。
藍玉春，「歐盟多層級治理：論點與現象」，政治科學論叢，第24期(2005年6月)。
蘇宏達，「從自由政府間主義解析里斯本條約的發展過程」，問題與研究，第49卷第2期(2010 年6月)，頁2-4
蘇宏達，「歐盟理事會」，載於黃偉峰主編，歐盟聯盟的組織與運作，第二版(台北：五南出版社，2007年12月)，頁185-186。
|
| 第7週 |
7. 歐盟安全政策研究
European Union, A Secured Europe in a Better World, European Security Strategy, Brussels, 12 December 2003.
European Union, Report on the Implementation of the European Security Strategy - Providing Security in a Changing World, Brussels, 11 December 2008, S407/08, pp. 3-6
European Commission, Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament, 10 May 2005, The Hague Programme: ten priorities for the next five years, COM(2005) 184 final, Official Journal C 236 of 24.9.2005.
|
| 第8週 |
8. 小國安全政策個案研究(西歐)
Skander Nasra, “Governance in EU Foreign Policy: Exploring Small State Influence,” Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 18, No. 2 (March 2011), pp. 164-180.
Ivo Maes and Amy Verdun, “Small States and the Creation of EMU: Belgium and the Netherlands, Pace-setters and Gate-keepers,” Journal of Common Market Studies, vol. 43, no. 2 (2005), pp. 330-331.
|
| 第9週 |
9. 小國安全政策個案研究(北歐)
David Arter, “Small State Influence Within the EU: The Case of Finland’s Northern Dimension Initiative,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 38, No. 5 (December 2000), pp. 679-682.
|
| 第10週 |
10. 小國安全政策個案研究(南歐)
Lucia Quaglia and Edward Moxon-Browne, “What makes a good EU Presidency? Italy and Ireland compared,” Journal of Common Market Studies, Vol. 44, No. 2 (2006), p. 351.
|
| 第11週 |
11. 小國安全政策個案研究(中東歐)
Martin Dangerfield, “The Visegrád Group in the Expanded European Union: From Preaccession to Postaccession Cooperation,” East European Politics & Societies, Vol. 22, No. 3 (Summer 2008), pp. 630-667.
Martin Dangerfield, “The Contribution of the Visegrad Group to the European Union's ‘Eastern’ Policy: Rhetoric or Reality?” Europe-Asia Studies, Vol. 61, No. 10 (December 2009), pp. 1740–1746.
Johan Leman and Stef Janssens, “Human smuggling and trafficking from/via Eastern Europe: the former ‘intelligence’ and the intermediary structures,” Journal on Moving Communities, Vol. 6, No. 1(2006).
|
| 第12週 |
12. 非歐盟之歐洲小國與其他國家
楊三億，「歐盟對烏克蘭誘因政策：從地緣政治觀點分析政策外溢效果」，問題與研究，第53卷第1期(2014年3月)，頁1-34。
楊三億，「前蘇聯地區內部改革與對外政策偏好關係：以烏克蘭、白俄羅斯與摩爾多瓦為例」，問題與研究，第48卷第3期(2009年9月)，頁97-121。
13. 小國安全政策影響力之評估
Simone Bunse, Small States and EU Governance (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillian, 2009).
Simon Bulmer and Christian Lequesne, The Member States of the European Union (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005), pp. 36-41. |
| 第13週 |
專題演講 |
| 第14週 |
電影欣賞 |
| 第15週 |
期末報告 |
| 第16週 |
期末報告
期末報告
期末報告 |
自主學習
內容 |
|
|